📋Steps in this guide1/6

Immutable Tables in Oracle Database 19c and 21c

An immutable table is a tamper-proof, insert-only table with an associated table-level and row-level retention period.

oracle 21cconfigurationintermediate

by OracleDba

38 views

Prerequisites

The parameter must be set to the correct value before we can use an immutable table. Oracle recommend caution when increasing the parameter. If in doubt, don't touch it.

Code/Command (click line numbers to comment):

conn / as sysdba

# 19c
alter system set compatible='19.11.0' scope=spfile;

# 21c
alter system set compatible='21.0.0' scope=spfile;

shutdown immediate;
startup;

Create an Immutable Table

In addition to adding the keyword to the command, there are two immutable clauses. The clause determines how long the table is protected from being dropped. If the table has no rows it can still be dropped. Unlike the initial releases of blockchain tables, the clause also prevents the table being dropped via a command. - : The table can't be dropped. Be careful about using this setting during testing. - : The table can't dropped until there have been no new rows inserted for the specified number of days. You may prefer to use 0 or 1 as the number of days during testing this functionality. The clause determines the retention period. How long each row will be protected from deletion. - : Each row is retained forever. The absence of the keyword implies the setting can be changed with the command, but it can't. Retention periods can only be increased. - : Same as . - : Each row is protected from deletion for the specified number of days, but this setting can be increased using the command. Minimum 16 days. - : Each row is protected from deletion for the specified number of days, and this setting can't be changed using the command. Minimum 16 days. Putting it all together gives us something like the following. Checking the view shows us several invisible columns have been added to our column list. The hidden columns are the same as those of a blockchain table, but unlike blockchain tables, only the and columns are populated. The rest of the columns are set to null. The hidden columns are described here . The views display information about immutable tables. It's a view over the table.

Code/Command (click line numbers to comment):

NO DROP [ UNTIL number DAYS IDLE ]

NO DELETE { [ LOCKED ] | (UNTIL number DAYS AFTER INSERT [ LOCKED ]) }

--drop table it_t1 purge;

create immutable table it_t1 (
  id            number,
  fruit         varchar2(20),
  quantity      number,
  created_date  date,
  constraint it_t1_pk primary key (id)
)
no drop until 0 days idle
no delete until 16 days after insert;

set linesize 120 pagesize 50
column column_name format a30
column data_type format a27
column hidden_column format a13

select internal_column_id,
       column_name,
       data_type,
       data_length,
       hidden_column
FROM   user_tab_cols       
WHERE  table_name = 'IT_T1'
ORDER BY internal_column_id;

INTERNAL_COLUMN_ID COLUMN_NAME                    DATA_TYPE                   DATA_LENGTH HIDDEN_COLUMN
------------------ ------------------------------ --------------------------- ----------- -------------
                 1 ID                             NUMBER                               22 NO
                 2 FRUIT                          VARCHAR2                             25 NO
                 3 QUANTITY                       NUMBER                               22 NO
                 4 CREATED_DATE                   DATE                                  7 NO
                 5 ORABCTAB_INST_ID$              NUMBER                               22 YES
                 6 ORABCTAB_CHAIN_ID$             NUMBER                               22 YES
                 7 ORABCTAB_SEQ_NUM$              NUMBER                               22 YES
                 8 ORABCTAB_CREATION_TIME$        TIMESTAMP(6) WITH TIME ZONE          13 YES
                 9 ORABCTAB_USER_NUMBER$          NUMBER                               22 YES
                10 ORABCTAB_HASH$                 RAW                                2000 YES
                11 ORABCTAB_SIGNATURE$            RAW                                2000 YES
                12 ORABCTAB_SIGNATURE_ALG$        NUMBER                               22 YES
                13 ORABCTAB_SIGNATURE_CERT$       RAW                                  16 YES
                14 ORABCTAB_SPARE$                RAW                                2000 YES

14 rows selected.

SQL>

column row_retention format a13
column row_retention_locked format a20
column table_inactivity_retention format a26

SELECT row_retention,
       row_retention_locked, 
       table_inactivity_retention
FROM   user_immutable_tables 
WHERE  table_name = 'IT_T1';

ROW_RETENTION ROW_RETENTION_LOCKED TABLE_INACTIVITY_RETENTION
------------- -------------------- --------------------------
           16 NO                                            0

SQL>

Alter an Immutable Table

The documentation suggests the clause can be altered using the command, as long as the retention period is not reduced. At the time of writing this doesn't seem to work in 19c for tables that were initially created with , as all values of days return an error. We currently have a retention period of 0 days for the table. In the following example we try to change it to 100 days, which gives an error. The command is syntactically correct, so I assume this is a bug in this release update. This command now works in 19.12 and 21.3. This command will work on tables created with or higher. Regardless of the current drop delay setting, an attempt to switch to the maximum value of causes an ORA-00600 error in 19c. This is still broken in 19.12, but this command does work properly on 21.3. This is a problem, as I would expect most people to want to play it safe by starting with a zero day delay, then upping the value later once they are happy with their setup. Starting on day one with a seems very risky, as the only way to remove the table is to drop the whole schema. Assuming it was not defined as locked, the clause can be modified using the command, as long as the retention period is not reduced. We currently have a row retention period of 16 days. In the example below we increase that value to 32. When we subsequently attempt to lower the value to 16 it gives an error. In the current release, attempting to set the row retention to , which is an increase in the retention period, results in an error. I assume this is a bug in the current release update. This is still broken in 19.12, but works correctly in 21.3.

Code/Command (click line numbers to comment):

alter table it_t1 no drop until 100 days idle;

Error report -
ORA-05732: retention value cannot be lowered

SQL>

alter table it_t1 no drop;

Error starting at line : 1 in command -
alter table it_t1 no drop
Error report -
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [atbbctable_1], [0], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], []

-- Increase to 32 days.
alter table it_t1 no delete until 32 days after insert;

Table IT_T1 altered.

SQL>


-- Decrease to 16 days (fail).
alter table it_t1 no delete until 16 days after insert;

Error report -
ORA-05732: retention value cannot be lowered

SQL>

alter table it_t1 no delete;

Error report -
ORA-00600: internal error code, arguments: [atbbctable_1], [0], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], [], []

Blocked DML and DDL Operations

As you would expect for an insert-only table, all DML and DDL operations that would result in row data being amended or deleted are prevented for an immutable table. The following example shows a successful insert, then some unsuccessful DML statements. Some DDL statements that could alter the contents of the data are also prevented. Here is an example of the statement. Extending existing columns is fine, but adding new columns or dropping existing columns is not allowed.

Code/Command (click line numbers to comment):

-- INSERT
insert into it_t1 (id, fruit, quantity, created_date ) values (1, 'apple', 20, sysdate);

1 row inserted.

SQL> commit;

Commit complete.

SQL>


-- UPDATE
update it_t1 set quantity = 10 where id = 1;

Error report -
SQL Error: ORA-05715: operation not allowed on the blockchain or immutable table

SQL>


-- DELETE
delete from it_t1 where id = 1;

Error report -
SQL Error: ORA-05715: operation not allowed on the blockchain or immutable table

SQL>

truncate table it_t1;

Error report -
ORA-05715: operation not allowed on the blockchain or immutable table

SQL>

-- Extend column.
alter table it_t1 modify (fruit varchar2(25));

Table IT_T1 altered.

SQL>


-- Add column
alter table it_t1 add (additional_info varchar2(50));

Error report -
ORA-05715: operation not allowed on the blockchain or immutable table

SQL>


-- Drop column.
alter table it_t1 drop column quantity;

Error report -
ORA-05715: operation not allowed on the blockchain or immutable table

SQL>

DBMS_IMMUTABLE_TABLE Package

The package is used for maintenance of immutable tables. The procedure removes any rows that are beyond the retention period. They can't be removed using a normal statement. Alternatively, we can limit the deletion by date. The rows will only be deleted if they are outside the retention period, and match the date criteria.

Code/Command (click line numbers to comment):

set serveroutput on
declare
  l_rows  number;
begin
  dbms_immutable_table.delete_expired_rows(
    schema_name            => 'testuser1',
    table_name             => 'it_t1',
    before_timestamp       => null,
    number_of_rows_deleted => l_rows);

  dbms_output.put_line('Rows Deleted=' || l_rows);
end;
/
Rows Deleted=0

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

SQL>

set serveroutput on
declare
  l_rows  number;
begin
  dbms_immutable_table.delete_expired_rows(
    schema_name            => 'testuser1',
    table_name             => 'it_t1',
    before_timestamp       => systimestamp - 60,
    number_of_rows_deleted => l_rows);

  dbms_output.put_line('Rows Deleted=' || l_rows);
end;
/
Rows Deleted=0

PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.

SQL>

Considerations

There are a number of things to consider when using immutable tables. I guess the main question should be, why would you use an immutable table? - If you need an insert-only tamper proof table in your application generally, this could be the solution. - If you want the added security of cryptographic hashes, you might want to consider blockchain tables. For more information see: Hope this helps. Regards Tim...

Comments (0)

Please to add comments

No comments yet. Be the first to comment!